Showing posts with label STUDY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label STUDY. Show all posts

Chocolate and heart disease recent study suggests that eating chocolate is good for the heart as published by the British Medical Journal (BMK).

The article in the magazine’s latest issue presented a large scale analysis of seven studies which involved more than 100,000 participants without heart disease.

According to the report, researchers at the University of Cambridge in England found that five of the studies revealed that high levels of chocolate consumption reduced heart disease risks.

A 37 percent reduction in heart disease was linked to studies in which participants ate the most chocolate, and 29 percent reduction in stroke compared to studies in which participants ate the least amount of chocolates.

The researchers however stressed that further study is needed to confirm the beneficial effect of chocolate consumption. Furthermore, some types of chocolate like milk chococaltes are said to be high in calories, in which eating too much could lead to obesity and increase the risk of diabetes and other diseases.

“You should eat chocolate in a moderate way and in a regular manner,” study author Dr. Oscar Franco said.

Filed Under: News
Tagged: Get updated with the hottest entertainment news daily by email!

Follow Starmometer on Twitter and Facebook!




View the original article here

Too Much TV

Too much TV is bad for your health like smoking, study says.

According to a research published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, every hour of television a person watches reduces the viewer’s life expectancy by almost 22 minutes. And if you’re watching more than 6 hours of TV a day, it will shorten your lifespan by a whopping 5 years!

The research is not saying that watching TV is bad, but it’s what you are NOT doing because you are watching TV. Aside from being physically inactive while watching TV, people typically munch food (specially junk foods) while they’re hooked on their favorite show.

Here are the side effects for watching too much TV:

1. Diabetes: Prolonged television watching could increase your chance of getting Type 2 diabetes.

2. Weight Gain: Another new study suggests that watching TV contributes to obesity among couch potatoes.

3. Headaches and Back pain: Recent research suggests that spending an excessive amount of time on screen-based activities may be bad for your back and it may cause headaches too.

Image courtesy of The Telegraph



View the original article here

Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but mindless mimicry can also make you look like a jerk. That’s the gist of a new study on empathetic body language that will appear in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science.

In social situations, people tend to mirror one another as an unconscious show of rapport. Find yourself on a successful first date, for example, and you will often lean in at the same times during conversation. And though most mirroring is done unintentionally, some adopt it as a subtle psychological strategy for closing sales and acing big job interviews.  

That said, clueless copycatting may be costly. Piotr Winkielman and Liam Kavanagh of the University of California San Diego psychology department and Christopher Suhler and Patricia Churchland of the school’s philosophy department examined ways in which mimicking the wrong person suggests low social IQ. 

“Often imitation is good,” Winkielman said. “We pick up good behavior from others. If you interact with someone and imitate them, there are positive things that come from it.”

But “mirroring of unfriendly or dismissive models can be costly or harm your reputation,” he said. For example, “if someone sees you kissing up to the obnoxious boss, they will think less of you. Mimicry is a form of kissing up, or it’s a form of communicating that you like this person or you want to be like this person.”

Participants in the study were asked to watch video of several staged interviews. In some clips, the interviewer was cordial, while in others the same interviewer was unfriendly or condescending. The interviewee alternated between mirroring mannerisms -- crossing legs, chin touching -- and having less responsive body language. 

After watching the videos, participants were asked to evaluate the interviewee on competence, likability and trustworthiness. And though they were not asked to specifically identify mimicry, participants deemed the interviewee less competent when imitating an unfriendly questioner. 

“We were surprised that the negative aspect of aligning yourself with this obnoxious model overrode any positive impressions,” Winkielman said. “Even if you do these innocent gestures that make you seem more like someone who is unfriendly, other people will think of you as incompetent or think less of you.”

Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.


View the original article here

Getty Images stock

Sorry, honey. You're not going to feel any better, and now your makeup is smudged.

It's truly a sob story for those prone to waterworks displays: Shedding tears only improved mood in one-third of cryers who kept tabs of their bawling behaviors, finds recent research.

Apparently weeping isn't the cathartic emotional release it's often cracked up to be, sniff, sniff. Please pass the tissues.

Science has previously looked into boo-hooing with mixed results: After viewers in a lab setting watched a sad film clip, weeping was rarely found to boost mood -- but this might not be the best place to burst into heartfelt tears. Other studies have asked participants to recall past crying episodes. But retrospective surveys might not necessarily reflect actual behavior since memory can be selective, and people might not remember those times when wailing made them feel worse.

This new study, currently published online in the Journal of Research in Personality, asked 97 women aged 18 to 48 in the Netherlands to keep a daily crying and mood diary over a two-to three-month period. Men were not included in this experiment because the data was originally collected as part of a larger trial exploring the link between crying and the menstrual cycle.

Each night, participants logged their daily mood, their urge to cry, and whether they shed any tears. If they wept, they kept further details of each sob session, such as the reason for it, how long it lasted, how intensely they bawled, where it occurred, whether other people were around and how they felt afterward.

Scientists ended up with 1,004 crying episodes to analyze: Their results showed that the average boo-hoo lasted eight minutes and took place in the living room, usually alone or with one other person present. Conflict, loss, or seeing others suffer were the most common triggers for tears.

For the majority of cases -- 61 percent of them -- sobbers reported no change in mood compared to how they felt before moisture streamed down their cheeks. Thirty percent experienced a better mood afterward and nine percent felt worse.

"Only a minority of crying episodes were associated with mood improvement -- against conventional wisdom," says Jonathan Rottenberg, an associate professor of psychology at the University of South Florida in Tampa, and the study's lead author.

The study found little evidence of any psychological payoffs from crying. But interestingly, it observed that participants who sobbed with the greatest intensity -- but not for the longest amount of time -- enjoyed the biggest bang from their bawling: Their moods benefitted the most from shedding tears.

"Crying is not nearly as beneficial as people think it is," says Rottenberg.

Rather than encouraging people to cry, it makes more sense, he suggests, to encourage them to bolster their social networks. "When crying helps it's likely not because of the tears but because it recruits social support and draws attention to important problems," explains Rottenberg.

While crying around one other person likely leads to comfort and active problem solving, sobbing around more people might spark feelings of shame, he says. 

What's been your experience? How do you feel after a good cry?

Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.


View the original article here

wowanonymous

Are adult MMO gamers the new couch potato?  According to the report in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, they find links between video gaming and health issues in older demographics aged 35 years old and above.

The author of  the said article, Dr. James B Weaver III, has hypothesized that adults who choose to have sedentary lifestyle which is just play the addicting video games are the ones vulnerable to risky health issues, such as higher BMI and poor mental-health days.

They find out that the average of these adult video-game addicts are overweight, low extroversion, and often depressed. These factors make them sacrifice real-world physical activities in exchange of secluded lifestyle. They also compared the time spent of these adult gaming enthusiasts versus the non-players in the internet through online gaming and online game support, apparently this is also in connection with adults in massive online games, days and night non-stop grinding.

They are quoted as saying that further research among adults will be conducted to on how use digital opportunities more effectively to promote health and prevent disease.

You can read the whole article in this link.

Source: www.alphagalileo.org

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


I do not claim ownership to the videos,images and some information. Please refer to the source links provided. Please think twice when submitting comments. I appreciate well thought out comments and not some profanity laced garbage that doesn't make any sense.

If you this article is very entertaining or educational, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!


View the original article here

Registry Booster

A few days back we had reported about an amusing story, where a Canadian firm AptiQuant had carried out an online survey and reached the conclusion that Internet Explorer users are the dumbest; Opera users, the smartest.

bogus IE users are dumb story: Bogus study from a bogus company!
It now appears that the study was bogus and the firm which carried out the survey was new. Even the company’s website was only recently set up and staff images which were displayed there were ripped off from a legitimate  business website owned by a Paris-based company Central Test.

Said David Spiegelhalter of Cambridge University’s Statistical Laboratory:

I believe these figures are implausibly low – and an insult to IE users. It’s obviously very easy to create a bogus site like this – as all phishers know it’s easy to rip-off someone else’s webpages and pictures, BBC reports.

BBC did try to contact the company, but no-one on ApTiquant’s  number was available for comment. It is unclear who was behind the stunt.

If you liked this article, please share it.

View the original article here

In the world of social media marketing, Facebook and Twitter dominate — but advertising on YouTube, LinkedIn and Foursquare is expected to increase in the coming year, according to research conducted at the May 2011 Pivot Conference.

Of the marketers surveyed, two-thirds were already participating in social media advertising, and 18% more planned to initiate campaigns in the next year. Success rates were nearly split down the middle, with 54% of those running ads reporting that they were satisfied with their social advertising activities.

Among survey respondents, 93% have deployed campaigns on Facebook, while 78% of respondents have advertised on Twitter.

The survey points toward an increase in advertising spend on YouTube, LinkedIn and Foursquare. At least 20% of respondents plan on deploying programs on those platforms in the next year.

It looks like a number of social platforms will be losing out on the advertising front in the coming year as well. More than 50% of advertisers responded that they have never — and do not plan to — run campaigns on MySpace, Meebo, Gowalla, Mylife and Tagged.

Despite the fact that a large number of advertisers surveyed have activated social campaigns, Facebook’s social advertising platform seems to be the only one that’s getting good ratings out of marketers. The above chart from eMarketer illustrates how ad offerings on social sites stack up against one another. Perhaps most surprising is the finding that only 22% of respondents believe that Foursquare’s ad offerings are “excellent” or “good.”

Regardless of the iffy feelings that marketers have toward current ad offerings on social platforms, this study indicates that marketers are ready to experiment with more social platforms beyond Facebook and Twitter.

What are your thoughts on social advertising? Which platforms does your company use and which does it plan to try in the coming year? Let us know in the comments below.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, ooyoo


View the original article here